Does it constitute a copyright infringement of Baidu Wenku for sharing literature works for free without obtaining consent of the writers? Can Baidu be exempted from liabilities for the reason that the documents are uploaded by internet users? The above issues have become most debated topics recently. Under such circumstances, journalist of IT-Times had an interview with Senior Lawyer Mr. Chambers Yang. In Mr. Yang's opinion, Baidu obviously infringed the right to network dissemination of information of writers and caused certain amount of property losses of such writers. Meanwhile, some non literature works, which have not attracted public attention, have also been shared on Baidu Wenku. As an internet company with wide influence inChina's IT industry, Baidu should have realized that an infringement on writers' right to network dissemination ofinformation would be caused by opening the uploading platform of Baidu Wenku to all internet users. Obviously, Baidu cannot be exempted from its liability for infringement by abusing the "SafeHarbor"principles.
Also, the journalist of IT Times had an interview with Mr. Yang on the case of Hudong.com ("Hudong") against Baidu, in which Hudong claims that Baidu takes advantage of its dominant position by manually modifying the search results and placing Baidu Baike at a higher rank than Hudong, which violates the Anti-Monopoly Law of China and constitutes an unfair competition. Mr. Yang considers that supporting evidences are needed to prove the dominant position of Baidu and its dominant position has been abused. However, by advancing the ranking auction above the search results, Baidu has obviously infringed the rights of search engine users and other internet services providers. If Hudong is able to prove Baidu's abuse of dominant position, it will be helpful to the internet environment. However, the legitimacy of splitting Baidu Corporation still needs to be directly supported by laws and regulations.
相关法律服务
杨春宝一级律师简介
杨春宝一级律师,大成上海高级合伙人、资本市场部主任、国资基金研究中心主任,大成中国区私募基金专业带头人、科技与文化法律研究中心联合牵头人。执业30余年,长期从事私募基金、投融资、并购重组法律服务,尤其对对赌研究颇深且具有非常丰富的实战经验,并专注于金融机构股权投资业务。2004年起多次入选The Legal 500"私募基金"和"公司与商业"等境内外各类律师榜单,代理的中国法院首例适用外国法律审理外国公司的董事损害小股东权益纠纷案入选上海高院发布的《上海法院域外法查明典型案例》和威科先行"要案头条"。入选上海涉外法律人才库、上海市司法局鼎新法治人才库、上海国有企业改制法律顾问团,具有上市公司独立董事任职资格,系多家知名高校的兼职教授或兼职研究生导师及上海市商务委跨国经营人才培训班讲师。出版《私募股权投资基金风险防控操作实务》等16本投融资法律专著。了解更多常见法律问题
互动百科诉百度垄断案中,百度行为是否构成滥用市场支配地位?
在中国反垄断法框架下,认定滥用市场支配地位需先界定相关市场,再评估经营者是否具有支配地位,最后判断其是否实施了排除、限制竞争的行为。互动百科主张百度利用其在搜索引擎市场的支配地位,通过人为调整搜索排序,将百度百科置于互动百科之前,这属于差别待遇或搭售行为,违反反垄断法。但法律实践要求原告承担较重的举证责任,必须证明相关市场的边界(如通用搜索服务市场)、百度的市场份额、市场控制力、进入壁垒等因素。仅凭搜索结果的排序差异,难以直接推定滥用。然而,百度在搜索结果中优先展示自家产品,可能构成自我优待,若该行为严重损害竞争对手的流量和商业机会,则可能被认定为不正当竞争或滥用行为。杨律师指出,百度通过竞价排名将商业推广结果置于自然搜索结果上方,已明显侵犯了搜索用户获取真实信息的权利,也损害了其他服务提供者的公平竞争机会。若互动百科能提供证据证明百度具有市场支配地位,并滥用该地位排斥竞争,将有助于净化互联网环境。但拆分百度公司这一主张,需要法律明确授权,现行法并无直接依据。实务中,此类案件胜诉难度较高,需依赖经济分析报告、用户数据、市场份额调查等专业证据。风险提示:反垄断诉讼周期长、成本高,且法院对相关市场界定持审慎态度。争议焦点集中在“相关市场”如何划定、百度的市场份额是否达到推定支配地位的标准,以及排序算法是否具有正当商业理由。
以上内容仅供参考,不构成法律意见。如需专业法律服务,请联系杨春宝一级律师:chambers.yang@dentons.cn




