Mr. Chambers Yang Helped His Client Won Favorable Award on Commercial Arbitration Heard by HKIAC

文章摘要 Mr. Chambers Yang has recently received the Final Award from Hong Kong International Arbitration Centre (HKIAC), which supported all claims filed by the applicant represented by Mr. Yang. In year 2008, a Singapore polysilicon company (the applicant) reached a Sales Contract with a Korean polysilic

Mr. Chambers Yang has recently received the Final Award from Hong Kong International Arbitration Centre (HKIAC), which supported all claims filed by the applicant represented by Mr. Yang.


In year 2008, a Singapore polysilicon company (the applicant) reached a Sales Contract with a Korean polysilicon company (the respondent) to purchase product from the Korean company. The Singapore company had prepaid all purchase amount in accordance with the Sales Contract, while the Korean company failed to perform all of its obligations under the Sales Contract. Through both parties’ consultation, it is agreed that the Korean company shall provide the Singapore company for another type of products instead of the original one. However, the Korean company still failed to fully perform its obligations under the supplementary agreement. Both parties signed another Payment Refund Agreement. However, the Korean company still failed to perform its obligations. Upon several notices being sent without any reply, the Singapore company decided to engage Haworth & Lexon as its attorney to file arbitration against the Korean company.


According to the clauses stipulated in the Sales Contract, Mr. Yang filed an arbitration notice to HKIAC in September 2010, and commenced the arbitration procedures. Through the 20-month procedures, HKIAC has rendered the Final Award, which is fully in favor of the applicant.

最后更新:2018年8月30日

杨春宝一级律师简介

杨春宝一级律师,大成上海高级合伙人、资本市场部主任、国资基金研究中心主任,大成中国区私募基金专业带头人、科技与文化法律研究中心联合牵头人。执业30余年,长期从事私募基金、投融资、并购重组法律服务,尤其对对赌研究颇深且具有非常丰富的实战经验,并专注于金融机构股权投资业务。2004年起多次入选The Legal 500"私募基金"和"公司与商业"等境内外各类律师榜单,代理的中国法院首例适用外国法律审理外国公司的董事损害小股东权益纠纷案入选上海高院发布的《上海法院域外法查明典型案例》和威科先行"要案头条"。具有上市公司独立董事任职资格,系多家知名高校的兼职教授或兼职研究生导师及上海市商务委跨国经营人才培训班讲师。出版《私募股权投资基金风险防控操作实务》等16本投融资法律专著。了解更多

常见法律问题

在HKIAC商业仲裁中,如何确保仲裁申请人的全部请求得到支持?

根据本案经验,需确保仲裁请求的法律依据充分且证据链条完整。依据《香港仲裁条例》第609章及HKIAC规则,申请人应清晰列明各项请求,并提交相关合同、往来函件等书证。同时,注意仲裁庭对举证责任和证明标准的把握,必要时申请证人出庭或专家鉴定。本案中,杨律师因系统梳理证据并准确援引适用法律,才使全部请求获支持。

HKIAC仲裁裁决的终局性如何?当事人能否就裁决提出上诉?

HKIAC仲裁裁决具有终局性,依据《香港仲裁条例》第73条,除法律规定的极少数情形外(如裁决违反公共政策或超出仲裁范围),当事人不得就实体问题上诉。本案中,最终裁决作出后即对双方具有约束力。若需推翻裁决,只能依据第81条申请撤销,但门槛极高。因此,当事人在仲裁程序中应充分陈述意见,避免裁决后救济困难。

香港国际仲裁中心仲裁与内地仲裁在程序上主要有哪些差异?

主要差异包括:HKIAC允许当事人选择普通法或衡平法原则,更强调交叉询问和证据开示;而内地仲裁更侧重书面审理和职权主义。本案适用的HKIAC规则赋予仲裁庭较大自由裁量权,如决定是否举行口头听证。另外,HKIAC支持临时措施和紧急仲裁员程序(依据《香港仲裁条例》第45条),内地《仲裁法》则无紧急仲裁员制度。当事人需根据争议性质选择合适仲裁地。

以上内容仅供参考,不构成法律意见。如需专业法律服务,请联系杨春宝一级律师:chambers.yang@dentons.cn

  • 本站声明:本站所载之法律论文、法律评论、案例、法律咨询等,除非另有注明,著作权人均为站长杨春宝高级律师本人。欢迎其他网站链接,但是,未经书面许可,不得擅自摘编、转载。引用及经许可转载时均应注明作者和出处"法律桥",并链接本站。本站网址:http://www.LawBridge.org。
  •  
  •         本站所有内容(包括法律咨询、法律法规)仅供参考,不构成法律意见,本站不对资料的完整性和时效性负责。您在处理具体法律事务时,请洽询有资质的律师。本站将努力为广大网友提供更好的服务,但不对本站提供的任何免费服务作出正式的承诺。本站所载投稿文章,其言论不代表本站观点,如需使用,请与原作者联系,版权归原作者所有。

发表回复